PDA

View Full Version : New slogans in Army recruiting commercials



oceanflower
11-22-2006, 11:23 AM
Army Debuts New Slogan In Recruiting Commercials

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer


Wednesday, November 22, 2006; A19


The Army, facing another tough recruiting season, launched a $200 million-a-year advertising campaign this month and unveiled a new slogan: "Army Strong."


The campaign's core message is that the Army builds not only physical but also mental and emotional strength in recruits, bonding them into a powerful, close-knit team.


"There's strong, and then there's Army strong," a deep male voice intones as martial music rises from a brass band in the background.
The television ads, launched nationwide for Veterans Day along with Internet placements and other outreach, omit all but the most fleeting images related to the all-volunteer Army's biggest endeavor ever: the war in Iraq.


The main 30- and 60-second ads show soldiers jogging in formation, scaling a rope obstacle course and leaping out of a helicopter -- all take place in what appear to be familiar, grassy, domestic settings. The only brief glimpse of what could possibly be Iraq is of a group of soldiers hastily raising a tent -- although, unlike others in the ad, these soldiers wear no helmets or body armor.


There are obvious reasons the Army might not want to underscore to potential recruits, and their parents, that signing up these days almost inevitably means deployment to combat zones in Afghanistan or Iraq, where the majority of the more than 2,850 killed and 21,000 wounded have been soldiers.


The Army missed its fiscal 2005 recruiting target by more than 6,000 soldiers but rebounded last year with the aid of thousands of added recruiters, a doubling of the maximum enlistment bonus to $40,000 and some eased standards. The Army begins fiscal 2007 with another hefty target of 80,000 recruits and only about 15 percent already in the pipeline -- compared with a goal of 25 to 30 percent.


Army officials acknowledge that parents and other influential adults are less likely to recommend military service today because of the ongoing conflicts, and surveys have shown that the wars have made some young people more wary of enlisting.


To address these concerns, two of the ads feature the parents of soldiers -- a farming couple and a mechanic and his wife -- whose worries about Army service evolve into pride. "I was pretty nervous, apprehensive," says the father, wearing a 1st Infantry Division cap and standing beside a cornfield.
"If your son or daughter wants to talk with you about joining the Army, listen. You made them strong, we'll make them Army strong," the announcer says in the English and Spanish ads launched on MTV, the History Channel, the Discovery Channel and other stations.


The television ads are coupled with Internet recruiting initiatives aimed at helping youths do their own research, including a presence on YouTube, Google, Yahoo and MySpace. Last Friday, the campaign expanded to offer potential recruits an "Ask a Soldier" discussion forum at GoArmy.com.
New York advertising firm McCann Erickson designed the campaign after winning the two-year Army contract, which can be renewed for three additional years.


The ads were tested on hundreds of soldiers, although studies show that it is difficult for the military to gain an accurate measure of the effectiveness of advertising, which is relatively expensive compared with other recruiting tools such as educational benefits and bonuses.


Asked how they felt about the "Army Strong" pitch, soldiers at the Pentagon had mixed reactions. "I like it because it gives a better picture of what the Army is," said Lt. Col. Wayne Cherry, a liaison officer for the Army's chief of staff. " 'Army Strong' is like a football team, a baseball team."


Sgt. 1st Class Mark Johnson was less enthusiastic. " 'Army Strong' is not telling me anything. It doesn't touch any emotional string," he said. "I don't think it will inspire people."


While soldiers were still formulating opinions on the new slogan, several held strong views about past ditties such as the nebulous "Army of One," which survived only five years until being replaced by "Army Strong."


"The 'Army of One' got lost in translation," quipped Col. David Reese, director for ministry initiatives of the Army's chief of chaplains. "I like 'Army Strong' because it symbolizes cohesiveness."


By far the most popular recent slogan, according to soldiers interviewed, was "Be All You Can Be," which lasted 20 years until a recruiting downturn saw it changed in 2001.


"To me, 'Army Strong' is kind of faddish. I've always liked 'Be All You Can Be' -- I missed that," said Lt. Col. Stephen Durham, a logistician.
" 'Be All You Can Be' could have gone on forever. It's such an evergreen thing," another Army official said wistfully.

Marlow
11-22-2006, 06:50 PM
"Army Strong" is a way better slogan than "Army of One". In fact I like "Army Strong" even better than "Be All You Can Be." "Army Strong" suggests a cohesive group, while while both the other two suggest personal motivation.

Musette
11-23-2006, 01:00 AM
"Army Strong" is a way better slogan than "Army of One". In fact I like "Army Strong" even better than "Be All You Can Be." "Army Strong" suggests a cohesive group, while while both the other two suggest personal motivation.

I agree. I always thought "Army of One" was an extremely unmilitary concept.

Judy

Rachel
11-23-2006, 05:28 PM
Whatever catch phrases the government 'fishers' use to catch their men, it is still the same old same old once they have signed on the dotted line.Hope,crushing realities, sorrow, anger, death and winning only inch by agonizing inch.

oceanflower
11-24-2006, 02:39 AM
These types of misleading recruiting techniques alwasy remind me of the movie Privat Benjamin. A very funny movie about the not-so-funny realities of armed service as compard with the truth-stretching promises.

Marlow
11-24-2006, 03:08 AM
Why do you ladies think it is misleading? Are you saying people don't know what it means to be in the Army?

Jezebel
11-24-2006, 03:28 AM
Does anyone really understand what it's like until they're smack in the middle of a war zone?

oceanflower
11-24-2006, 03:43 AM
The military (Army, Navy, Marine Corps) certainly doesn't describe what it's going to be like to serve in Iraq, and that the the recruit may very well not get home alive in order to take advantage of the G. I. Bill and go off to college, especially after he's been recalled back to Iraq 1 or 2 more times as my uncle in the Reserves was. Not only that, but the benefits are not so wonderful...I ought to know, I was married to a Naval sunmarine officer...and as an officer his benefits were better than most. Many of his enlisted men were being paid well below the povery line, and their wives were using food stamps and WIC benefits at the military commissary. Did the recruiting officer tell them that? I doubt it.

A great number of recruits are fresh out of high school, young and naive. They will enter the military as enlisted men and at the bottom of the heap. If the recruiting office doesn't outline the whole picture for these boys, then it's misleading.

Marlow
11-24-2006, 08:33 PM
It's interesting. The people I know who were in the Army had no illusions and while some were cynical of the experience I don't think they got what they didn't expect, but were somewhat relatively proud of their experience in the end. The people I know who were in the Navy mostly hated it all, felt they didn't get what they expected (must be those six month intervals at sea), and despised the whole experience. Of course that is a small universe of people, so I'm not generalizing.

Rachel
11-24-2006, 09:55 PM
My friend that is in his early twenties on his second stint in Iraq is living on prozac and seeing his friends one minute eating with him, the next laying dead, or the Iraqui interpretor blown to bits by a suicide bomber,these are the realities. He survives one small increment of time after another.
It is hell. No matter even if a guy that goes into it is happy to use his weapons to kill the enemy. It is a shattering ugly experience to have to kill someone or live in the constant dread that this hour is your last.
Just reading his letters to me has affected my stomach and my nerves. And he is not complaining only giving me the details. His father and sister were killed last year in a car accident and he is all his mother has. He wants to make it home to her.
Saddam's guilty verdict terrified all the guys in his unit. They waited in absolute silent dread waiting for the terrorists to strike. Hour after hour they waited.
this is the reality, no matter h ow much you love your country and want to help and make a difference.

And as Liz said many were living below the poverty line How dare any government, mine, yours ask a man to go and face constant fear, be in never ending harm's way and then treat them so shamefully. I saw a documentary on that and I was so ashamed and sick at heart I cried for weeks about it. No wonder anger, hostility and fights in the home were often the rule, the frustration and despair was overwhelming.

Marlow
11-25-2006, 02:21 AM
And as Liz said many were living below the poverty line How dare any government, mine, yours ask a man to go and face constant fear, be in never ending harm's way and then treat them so shamefully. I saw a documentary on that and I was so ashamed and sick at heart I cried for weeks about it. No wonder anger, hostility and fights in the home were often the rule, the frustration and despair was overwhelming.

Frankly, I'm not going to get really into this, but the whole poverty thing is a bit exaggerated. Yes a number of years ago some soldier's families were given food stamps as supplements in some crazy idea that some beuroacrat had (what would be the difference if the government gave him money or food stamps, it's still the same out of the government's pocket), but that was short lived (a public relations disaster that still obviously echoes). In the past six or seven years there has been an extraordinary effort to compsensate military families. But it's not so much salary, which has increased, but quality of life issues. So the government has closed down several facilities so that it can redirect those dollars to upgrading existing facilities. As far as I can tell, they've done a decent job. But you know, even in the past, the standard of living of an 18 year old out of high school is not going to be high. I think when you calculate the free medical and education that you get in the military, the standard of living of an 18 year old soldier compares favorably.