PDA

View Full Version : Tax Workers spying on es-spouses, and others



Rachel
06-23-2010, 11:14 PM
y Dean Beeby, The Canadian Press, thecanadianpress.com, Updated: June 22, 2010
Tax workers snooping on ex-spouses, family members

OTTAWA - Dozens of workers at Canada's tax agency have been caught snooping on their ex-spouses, mothers-in-law, creditors and others by reading confidential tax files.

Internal reports at the Canada Revenue Agency show that rogue employees are improperly reviewing the private financial affairs of taxpayers without their knowledge.

And some are using agency computers to give favoured treatment to colleagues, friends, family — and themselves.

In one egregious breach last October, a woman accessed 37,500 emails and 776 documents containing confidential financial information about ordinary Canadians. She downloaded the files onto 17 compact discs for her personal use, inexplicably helped by agency technicians.

Documents outlining the forbidden invasions into private tax data were obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

More on Saving & Debt
World Cup: by the numbersLiving on $18K a year -- by choiceThe world's oddest currenciesWhat does wealth mean?Time for a longer school year?
In one case, a worker secretly operated a business on the side with her spouse, and between 2004 and 2009 "accessed the accounts of two creditors and the spouse of one of those creditors."

Another worker was found to have inspected his spouse's tax information 69 times without permission.

A woman in one unidentified office poked into the agency's data looking for confidential information on colleagues, friends and family — apparently to give them a break on their taxes.

"The employee made unauthorized access to the tax information of three colleagues and to the tax information of a colleague's daughter, spouse and mother," says one report.

"She accessed her own tax information and the tax information (of) 13 relatives.... She provided preferential treatment to colleagues, relatives and acquaintances."

Agency gumshoes then stumbled on a secret cell of snoopers in the same location.

"The investigation also determined that 13 other employees of the same office made unauthorized accesses to taxpayer information. Of the 13 employees, 10 provided preferential treatment to taxpayers, five accessed their own tax information, four received preferential treatment ..."

Another worker peeked at secret agency information about two companies she operated on the side — while those firms were undergoing tax audits.

"In addition, the employee made extensive unauthorized accesses to the taxpayer information of friends and family members and hundreds of other individuals."

Yet another investigation found an employee peering into the electronic tax files of two of her spouse's business partners, though the motive is not specified.

The documents show that ex-spouses are sometimes targeted, for reasons not made clear in the heavily censored material from September and October last year. Family members were also a favoured target.

Some workers who were caught claimed they were simply helping relatives file their income-tax forms.

But one worker admitted using the CRA computer system and confidential tax information to issue himself a false charitable donation receipt for $3,000, thus reducing his income-tax payable.

Agency records for 2008-2009 show there were 29 cases in which workers were caught accessing taxpayer records without authorization, about the annual average for the last five years. And there were a dozen instances in 2008-2009 in which tax records were improperly disclosed to third parties.

Video from BNNRIM Earnings Preview [06-23-10 3:45 PM]
Summit 2010: Sovereign Debt [06-23-10 12:30 PM]
GM IPO [06-23-10 10:35 AM] All information about disciplinary measures taken against staff who broke the rules is censored in the released documents. But in several cases, the agency appeared to be lenient with long-term employees.

"The employee admitted that she accessed the taxpayer information belonging to a former employer, her relatives including her mother, her father, her sister and her brother, as well as the information belonging to her former spouse," says one report.

In deciding on discipline, "management took into consideration the employee's years of service, her good employment record and her co-operation with the investigation."

A spokesman for the agency said the number of breaches is relatively small, given that there are more than 40,000 employees.

"While the number of unauthorized access incidents is not large, the agency consistently continues to review its activities to enhance ... prevention, detection and deterrence," Noel Carisse said in an email response to questions.

Carisse said taxpayers are not always informed when workers improperly access files because the breach may be judged too minor. But taxpayers whose information is improperly disclosed to third parties are almost always alerted by telephone or mail.

"The (CRA) assessment will almost always lead to the conclusion that injury to the taxpayer is likely, or has already occurred," he said, referring to disclosures.

Carisse did not provide information on the numbers of employees suspended, fired or criminally charged for such breaches, but said the agency has a "strict and enforced Code of Ethics and Conduct."

"While any unauthorized access is unacceptable, the agency believes that the current numbers indicate that the agency is doing a good job protecting taxpayer information."

He declined to provide any further information on the worker who downloaded 37,500 emails and 776 documents, saying only that the investigation continues.

There have been previous reports of isolated security breaches by insiders at the tax agency.

CTV News reported last year, for example, that a tax agency worker was found to be leaking confidential information to a violent gang in British Columbia. The worker was suspended months after the agency was first alerted to the problem through a police wiretap.

Jez
06-24-2010, 01:56 AM
Yup, this is yet another reason why it's not such a great idea for the government to compile tons and tons of private data on people. Employees are people, and people are nosy. I hope all those people who love the idea of government run health care recognize the fact that the kind of occurrences described in that article will be happening with their private health information (including the embarrassing information, like STD tests, or psych session transcripts). Enjoy! Stupidity hurts, and unfortunately it's going to hurt the smart people as well.

Add in things like the Freedom of Information Act we have here, and private data is often given out when it shouldn't be. In NY, a list of all of the pistol permit holders in NY state was just leaked. The information includes the permit holder's full name and full address. That's information that, according to the FOIA, should never have been given out. Apparently the government worker who gave out the information didn't know that or didn't care, however, because they gave the list to a person who filed a FOIL request. That person then distributed that information across the internet. This has happened in the past in other areas and the result is always the same. Criminals target those homes when they're looking for a "clean' weapon to use in a crime. Criminals look up the police officers and judges who arrested and sentenced them and they exact revenge. People who have been in hiding from abusive spouses and stalkers suddenly have their address revealed to their attacker. People have died, been robbed, vandalized, and injured as a result of such leaks (which is exactly why it is illegal for this information to be given out in a FOIL request). When the government has a list, that list will eventually find its way where it shouldn't. But do people ever think of this when they're passing legislation? Well, the intelligent people do, but recent events show intelligent people are in short supply.

margaine
06-24-2010, 02:42 AM
"Information, we need INFORMATION/ You won't get it/ By hook or by crook, we WILL." This discussion makes me think of the TV show The Prisoner.

Xcaxlxgnvf0

(sorry it looks and sounds so bad)

musi
06-24-2010, 05:46 AM
That's vile.
I know that in Estonia if you want to access anybody's information (we have everything computerized), you need the permission. It means, that in the end of the day, if you checked somebody, you have to have a proof, why you checked him or her. Same goes for the police database, it seems - you cannot just search for people and look for their information - you can only do it in cases assigned to you. I was glad to hear that, actually.

Jez
06-24-2010, 05:31 PM
That's vile.
I know that in Estonia if you want to access anybody's information (we have everything computerized), you need the permission. It means, that in the end of the day, if you checked somebody, you have to have a proof, why you checked him or her. Same goes for the police database, it seems - you cannot just search for people and look for their information - you can only do it in cases assigned to you. I was glad to hear that, actually.

That's mostly how it is here. Even with needing proof, even if someone looked and was later found not to have sufficient reason to look, the damage is done. It helps to have safeguards like you describe, but none are foolproof. The only foolproof approach is to not compile databases in the first place. Sometimes this is impossible (like with tax information), but in most cases there is no reason for a database to be created (like pistol permit holders).

Rachel
06-24-2010, 09:04 PM
I guess the thing that bothers me is that probably nothing much will happen to these rotters. Especially the lady with all that seniority. I know my ex husband did something like that to me and I got audited, even though he was the crook, claiming me and documenting that he had been p0aying me a large salary , for three years he did that and nothing happened to him. I was cleared of course and given all my refund back with interest, but it was anguish all the same.
In this country we are so polite that we are the only government on both federal and provincial levels that are so kind to the murderers and crooks, the abusers and such that we honestly do believe just anyone can be rehabilitated, even the child rapists and the serial killers. that is why these crimes continue, the good guys get slammed for the smallest things and the bad guys, corrupt to the core have more rights than the rest of us will probably ever know in our lives. Drunk drivers that kill usually get two years less a day and while in prison can get their law degree free, all the work out equipment you could imagine, art classes, free shrink sessions galore, special diets and on and on. So something like this tax thing is really no big deal. I hate thinking that people that don't like me can , when they know the right people find out just anything they like here I sincerely hope our country learns to be kind but terribly firm and unyielding with this sort of thing and lilke Jez said just knock it off with giving alll that sort of info out in the first place.
Jez, you wouldn't wish to try to be prime minister here any time would you? Just a dual citizen ship and hang out for so many months per year and bob's your uncle. Why William Shatner from Star Trek is a big possibiltiy right now. :) And you have actual brains.

Winifred
06-24-2010, 10:30 PM
My Dad was married (one of his several) to a lady who worked for the IRS. After the divorce, he was audited for 6 years in a row....got really good at organizing his receipts....

margaine
06-24-2010, 11:15 PM
My Dad was married (one of his several) to a lady who worked for the IRS. After the divorce, he was audited for 6 years in a row....got really good at organizing his receipts....

wow, really?! Yikes!! You'd think the IRS would have better things to do than audit the same guy 6 years in a row . . . sketchy indeed!

Jez
06-24-2010, 11:21 PM
In this country we are so polite that we are the only government on both federal and provincial levels that are so kind to the murderers and crooks, the abusers and such that we honestly do believe just anyone can be rehabilitated, even the child rapists and the serial killers. that is why these crimes continue, the good guys get slammed for the smallest things and the bad guys, corrupt to the core have more rights than the rest of us will probably ever know in our lives.
YES!! To everything you said on this. This system is killing us.


Jez, you wouldn't wish to try to be prime minister here any time would you? Just a dual citizen ship and hang out for so many months per year and bob's your uncle. Why William Shatner from Star Trek is a big possibiltiy right now. :) And you have actual brains.

:p Thanks Rachel. :D

Jez
06-24-2010, 11:27 PM
wow, really?! Yikes!! You'd think the IRS would have better things to do than audit the same guy 6 years in a row . . . sketchy indeed!

Better things to do? If it's wasteful, inefficient, or pointless, then the government is all over it like a donkey on a waffle. How did that quote go? Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other. Isn't it nice to know that our money we earned was taken from us in taxes to help fund that woman's revenge?